< Explain other AI papers

Are We on the Right Way for Assessing Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation?

Wenxuan Shen, Mingjia Wang, Yaochen Wang, Dongping Chen, Junjie Yang, Yao Wan, Weiwei Lin

2025-08-08

Are We on the Right Way for Assessing Document Retrieval-Augmented
  Generation?

Summary

This paper talks about Double-Bench, a new evaluation system designed to test how well document Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems perform, using large, multilingual, and multimodal data.

What's the problem?

The problem is that current benchmark systems for RAG models don’t cover enough languages, types of data, or detailed checks of different parts of the system, which makes it hard to know how well these models really work.

What's the solution?

The solution was to create Double-Bench, which uses a much bigger and more diverse set of documents and queries, including different languages and data modes like text and images, to thoroughly evaluate the retrieval and generation parts of RAG systems.

Why it matters?

This matters because having a better way to test RAG systems helps developers improve them, making these models more accurate, reliable, and useful for finding and generating information from documents across many languages and fields.

Abstract

Double-Bench is a large-scale, multilingual, and multimodal evaluation system for document Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, addressing limitations in current benchmarks and providing comprehensive assessments of system components.