SweEval: Do LLMs Really Swear? A Safety Benchmark for Testing Limits for Enterprise Use
Hitesh Laxmichand Patel, Amit Agarwal, Arion Das, Bhargava Kumar, Srikant Panda, Priyaranjan Pattnayak, Taki Hasan Rafi, Tejaswini Kumar, Dong-Kyu Chae
2025-05-28
Summary
This paper talks about a new test called SweEval that checks how well large language models, or LLMs, follow rules about not using offensive language, especially when people try to get them to break those rules.
What's the problem?
The problem is that even though LLMs are supposed to avoid swearing or using bad language, it's not always clear if they actually follow these guidelines, especially when users give tricky instructions or when cultural differences make certain words more or less offensive.
What's the solution?
The researchers created the SweEval benchmark, which is a set of tests designed to see if LLMs will use bad language when asked, and to measure how well they respect both ethical rules and the different ways cultures view offensive words.
Why it matters?
This matters because making sure AI doesn't use inappropriate language is really important for businesses and organizations that want to use these models safely and responsibly, especially in environments where people expect professional and respectful communication.
Abstract
SweEval is a benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' compliance with ethical guidelines and cultural nuances when instructed to include offensive language.